HARENDRA MAHTO And ORS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS
WPC/1500/2009 · 2026-04-16
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6128 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6128 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10811
--1-- W.P. (C.) No. 1500 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P. (C.) No. 1500 of 2009
----
1. Harendra Mahto, son of Late Shyamlal Mahto
2. Prakash Mahto, son of Late Tejpal Mahto
3. Mahadeo Mahto, son of Late Shyamlal Mahto
4. Anjani Kumar @ Anjani Mahto, son of Late Sahdeo Mahto
5. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Mahto, son of Late Sahdeo Mahto All are resident of village – Ramgarh, Koeri Tola, PO and PS – Ramgarh, District -Hazaribagh (Now Ramgarh)
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Bhuna Mahto, son of Late Amrit Mahto
3. Raghunandan Mahto, son of Late Amrit Mahto
4. Jugal Mahto, son of Late Amrit Mahto
5. Bifan Mahto, son of Late Kartik Mahto
6. Ram Prasad Mahto, son of Late Kartik Mahto
7. Jairam Mahto, son of Late Kartik Mahto
8. Rajendra Mahto, son of Late Kartik Mahto All are resident of village – Ramgarh, Koeri Tola, PO and PS – Ramgarh, District – Hazaribagh (Now Ramgarh)
9. Shib Shankar Mahto, son of Late Amrit Mahto, resident of village – Ramgarh, Koeri Tola, PO and PS – Ramgarh, District – Hazaribagh (now Ramgarh)
10. Puran Lal Mahto, son of Late Akal Mahto
11. Mohan Mahto, son of Late Akal Mahto
12. Hari Charan Mahto, son of Late Akal Mahto
13. Lekhraj Mahto, son of Late Akal Mahto All are resident of village Ramgarh, Koeri Tola, PO and PS – Ramgarh, District – Hazaribagh, (Now Ramgarh)
.... Respondents
----
2026:JHHC:10811
--2-- W.P. (C.) No. 1500 of 2009
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- None
For the State
:- Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate
---- 05/16.04.2026 On repeated calls, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the State is present.
2. On 16.04.2010 also nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioners and identical is the situation today. It appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in this matter, as such this petition is hereby dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 16.04.2026 Sangam/