Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6124 (GUJ)

DILIP MANCHHALAL PARIHAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCR.A/12504/2025 · 2026-03-03

M R Mengdey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 12504 of 2025 ========================================================== DILIP MANCHHALAL PARIHAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR.KARANSINH SOLANKI(6541) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 03/03/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Advocate Mr. D.M. Ahuja shall file his appearance before the Registry. 2. Present application is preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No.11191011240307 of 2024 dated 27.11.2024 registered with DCB Police Station, Ahmedabad City for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent – State. 4. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent – State. 5. Learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to p. 2 proceed with the complaint any further. He further submitted that the petitioner is not having any other antecedents. 6. Learned Advocate Mr. Mr. D.M. Ahuja appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 (Original Complainant) has placed on record duly sworn in Affidavit dated 13.01.2025. 7. From the record, it appears that the petitioner had earlier preferred SCRA No.16573 of 2024 with a prayer for quashment of the impugned FIR. However, the said petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2024 and thereafter, the present successive petition has been filed by the petitioner with the very same prayer. However, after dismissal of the earlier petition, the matter has been settled between the parties and the complainant who is also present before the Court has submitted that he has no objection if the petition be allowed and the FIR in question is quashed. Thus, the circumstances has changed after the dismissal of the earlier petition. 8. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The FIR being CR No.11191011240307 of 2024 dated 27.11.2024 registered with DCB Police Station, Ahmedabad City is hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute. (M. R. MENGDEY,J) RAVI OZA