Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6119 (RAJ)

SURAJ CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI RANJEET v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1898/2026 · 2026-03-24

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12359] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1898/2026 1. Suraj Choudhary S/o Shri Ranjeet, R/o Village Tihari, Police Station Shrinagar, Ajmer (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer) (Rajasthan). 2. Dilkhush S/o Shri Babulal, R/o Village Tihari, Police Station Shrinagar, Ajmer (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer) (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vaishnavi Mr. Vishal Gurjar Mr. Rahul Sogani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/03/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.357/2025 registered at Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that no recovery of any alleged amount has been effected from the present petitioners. She again submits that the petitioners have not been named in the FIR. She also submits that [2026:RJ-JP:12359] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1898/2026] the entire alleged amount has already been recovered from the co-accused Surendra. Petitioners are behind the bars since 11.12.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Suraj Choudhary S/o Shri Ranjeet & Dilkhush S/o Shri Babulal, shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/34