DIPAK KUMAR S/O SHRI LAXMAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/86/2026 · 2026-03-23
Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11964-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 86/2026 Dipak Kumar S/o Shri Laxman, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Bairoj, Padampura, Todaram, Karauli, Rajasthan-321611. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj)
2. Superintendent Of Police, Jalore District Jalore. (Raj)
3. Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Jalore, District Jalore. (Raj)
4. Station House Officer, Police Station- Bishangarh, District Jalor.
5. Sutaram S/o Malaram, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Was, Narsana, P.o. Bishangarh, Dist. Jalore (Raj-34302)
6. Sorab W/o Sutaram, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Was, Narsana, P.o.- Bishangarh, Dist. Jalore (Raj-34302)
7. Praveen Kumar S/o Sutaram, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Was, Narsana, P.o.- Bishangarh, Dist. Jalore (Raj-34302) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Khedar with Mr. Naveen Joshi for Mr. Satish Kumar Khandal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Judgment / Order 23/03/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this habeas corpus petition is rendered infructuous. The habeas corpus petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-133