Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6114 (RAJ)

SMT. TANNU PRIYA BEDI W/O SHRI AKSHAY SONI D/O SANTRAM BEDI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/356/2026 · 2026-03-06

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 356/2026 1. Smt. Tannu Priya Bedi W/o Shri Akshay Soni D/o Santram Bedi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 88 A Doctor Colony Ajmer Road DCM Jaipur At Present R/o With Her Husband At 1668 Khawas Ji Ka Rasta Badi Chaupar, Jaipur. 2. Aksha Soni S/o Mahesh Soni, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1668 Khawas Ji Ka Rasta Badi Chaupar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur. 4. The S.H.O./ Nodel Officer, Police Station, Chitrakoot, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur. 5. The S.H.O. Police Station Manak Chok, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur. 6. Shri Santram Bedi S/o Lt. Shri Kallu Ram Bedi, Aged About 64 Years, R/o 88 A Doctors Colony Sarathi Marg Near Chitrakoot, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Kanta Bedi W/o Shri Sant Ram Bedi, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 88 A Doctors Colony Sarathi Marg Near Chitrakoot, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Naveen Bedi S/o Shri Santram Bedi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 682 Saket Nagar, Ner Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. 9. Rakhi Chouhan W/o Naveen Bedi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 682 Saket Nagar, Ner Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP [2026:RJ-JP:9823] (2 of 3) [CRLW-356/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.6 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Babu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 23.01.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.6 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4 - Station House Officer, Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur City (West) (Raj) and respondent No.4 is directed to [2026:RJ-JP:9823] (3 of 3) [CRLW-356/2026] provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/348