Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6113 (CAL)

SUBRATA BERA v. THE PRADHAN SRIRAMPUR I GRAM PANCHAYAT (UNDER TAMLUK PANCHAYAT SAMITY) AND ORS.

WPA/3914/2025 · 2026-01-14

Kausik Chanda

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.01.2026 Sl No.A723 Ct. No.15 S.A. WPA 3914 of 2025 Subrata Bera -vs- The Pradhan, Srirampur-I Gram Panchayat & Ors. Mr. Kajal Ray Mr. Suman Nandi …for the petitioner Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal Mr. Soumen Pradhan Ms. Payel Khanra …for respondent nos.6 & 7 It is the grievance of the petitioner that his neighbours, respondent nos. 6 and 7, have constructed the first floor of a building at Plot No. 675, Mouza–Kismat Putputia, Block–Tamluk-I, District–Purba Medinipur without any permission from concerned Panchayat. It is the specific case of the petitioner that although the ground floor of the building was constructed pursuant to a sanctioned plan, the first floor has been raised without obtaining any permission from the Panchayat Authority. From the photographs annexed to the writ petition, it appears that the first floor had already been constructed by respondent nos. 6 and 7 even prior to the filing of the writ petition. Having consciously permitted such construction to continue and having approached this Court only 2 after completion of the building, the petitioner cannot now contend that the construction is being carried out without a sanctioned plan. Such conduct attracts the well-established principles of delay, acquiescence, and want of bona fides. The writ jurisdiction under Article 226, being discretionary and grounded in considerations, cannot be invoked to resurrect an equitable right that the petitioner has clearly forfeited. Accordingly, WPA 3914 of 2025 stands dismissed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)