Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6111 (PNJ)

MEHAKPREET SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CRM-M/17589/2026 · 2026-05-04

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.17589 of 2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 Mehakpreet Singh and another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Mehakpreet Singh and Ms. Mohpreet Kaur, petitioners appeared through VC. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition under Section 528 of BNSS (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.) is for issuing direction to respondents No.1 to 6 for registration of FIR against respondents No.8 and 9 and provide suffice police protection in the interest of justice. The representation is Annexure P-1. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel, on the instructions from SI Gurikbal Singh, submits that regarding the dispute, as alleged by the petitioners, FIR has already been registered against respondent No.9. He has also placed on record the copy of the FIR, which is taken on the record. 4. Since the FIR in the present case has already been registered, the present petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. 5. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 04.05.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.05.05 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD