Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6110 (ALL)

BELAL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/34406/2026 · 2026-09-07

Kshitij Shailendra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34406 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 20018 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202517650220018) (Belal Ahmad Vs. Anand Kumar Yadav and others) has been made in this petition. 2. A perusal of the order sheet indicates that on all the dates, the lawyers remained on strike and, therefore, the matter has not yet proceeded. 3. In view of the above fact situation and the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. State of U.P. and others: 2024 (3) ADJ 295 (SC), no case for issuance of direction stands made out at this stage. 4. The writ petition is dismissed with an observation that in case the lawyers start cooperating with the matter and the proceedings of the aforesaid case reach to such a stage where direction can be issued, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file another petition at that stage and not before that. 5. If such a petition is filed, copy of this order shall positively be annexed as Annexure-1 to the said petition. September 8, 2026 AKShukla/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rayoof Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Belal Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad