APHC010162662026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9005/2026 Between: 1. THODETI CHANDRAKALA, W/O CHITTIBABU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O ANNAREDDYPALEM SANGAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. PATRURUMASTHANAIAH,, S/O BUJJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O JENDA DIBBA VILLAGE SANGAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. PATURU SUREKHA,, W/O.MOCHERLA MASTANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O HARIJANAVADA, MINAGALU VILLAGE, BUCCHI REDDYPALEM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522237 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524001 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI 2 DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524001 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUCCHI REDDY PALEM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 522001 6. RONDLASEETARAMAMMA, W.O LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,R/O.JENDA DIBBA, SANGAM MANDAL.SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524001 7. JEDDA MAHITHARAVAMMA, W/O MAYURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O TARUNAVAYI VILLAGE, SANGAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524001 8. RONDIA KAVITHA, D/O LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O JENDA DIBBA SANGAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MEDIKONDA PRANAY VENKAT CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “… to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioners to the police station and harassing the petitioners to handover the possession of the suit scheduled property which is pending on the file of the principle junior civil judge court kovuru through vide OS.No 393/2025 despite being an injunction order granted in favour of the petitioners is in force in lA.No 688/2025 of OS.No 393/2025 and continuously threatening the petitioners to settle the civil dispute which is pending on the file of the principle junior civil judge court kovuru vide OS.No 393/2025 as illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and also contrary to the doctrine of separation of powers and consequently direct the respondents to not to interfere into the civil dispute which is pending on the file of the junior civil judge court kovuru through vide OS.No 393/2025 and not to threaten, summon or harass the petitioners with respect to the pending civil suit vide OS.No 393/2025 and pass…” 3 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Medikonda Pranay Venkat Chowdary, learned counsel for the Petitioners, submits that Respondent No.3 is interfering in the civil disputes pending between the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.6 to 8 in respect of land measuring Ac.0.60 cents in Sy.No.3, situated at Kavetipallam village, Butchireddypalem Mandal. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that petitioner No.2 had approached the Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District, based on which, the respondent No.5 has called the petitioners to police station and conducted a preliminary enquiry as contemplated under section 175(3) of the Bharathiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) and that in the Preliminary enquiry, it is noticed that the dispute in between the petitioners and respondent No.6 to 5 is civil in nature. Therefore, the police have not further called the petitioners to police station. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent No.5 not to interfere henceforth in the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondent Nos.6 to 8 without following due process of law. 4 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 08.04.2026 SSA 5 189 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9005 of 2026 Date: 08.04.2026 SSA