Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6109 (UTT)

PRAVEEN TOMAR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

WPMS/1510/2026 · 2026-05-25

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4098 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.1510 of 2026 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned Counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Dy.A.G. for the State. 3. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent-District Magistrate Haridwar to consider and decide the application dated 29.06.2022 filed by petitioner for grant of Arms License of pistol/revolver. 4. It is the contention of learned Counsel for petitioner that petitioner is a farmer and a practicing advocate who moved the application on 29.06.2022 before the respondent-District Magistrate for grant of Arms License of pistol/revolver. The number of application is ‘2009’ dated 29.06.2022. Petitioner seeks a direction to be issued to the respondent –District Magistrate, Haridwar to consider and decide the said application within a stipulated period. 5. To this, there is no opposition from the side of the State. 6. The prayer made is innocuous in nature. 7. The writ petition is, therefore, allowed. A writ of mandamus is issued to the respondent-District Magistrate, Haridwar to consider and decide the Application No.2009 dated 29.06.2022 strictly in accordance with law and after considering all aspects, within a period of two months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.05.2026 R.Dang