Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6109 (PNJ)

MALTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER

CRM-M/65861/2025 · 2026-04-09

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

302 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA MALTA STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Harkaran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Rituraj Sing Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pen 09.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Harkaran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-65861-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 09.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. ding applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to HIMANSHU 2026.04.09 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document