Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
302 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MALTA STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Mr. Harkaran Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner (through V.C.).
Mr. Rituraj Sing
Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2.
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
All pen
09.04.2026 himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Harkaran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2.
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-65861-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 09.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Ms. Sujata, Advocate for respondent No.2. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. ding applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU)
JUDGE
earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to HIMANSHU 2026.04.09 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document