HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30501 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 220 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Matsaina, District- Firozabad. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the wife of the first informant had executed a partnership deed with the applicant for carrying on the business of a water plant, and the alleged transaction pertains to the business transactions between the parties.It is next submitted that the first informant has himself admitted in his statement that, out of the total amount of Rs. 15 lakhs, an amount of Rs. 9 lakhs has already been returned to him. It is next submitted that the co- accused Deepak Gupta and Gopendra have already been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 27.08.2025 & 26.06.2025 passed in in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No.5048 of 2025 and in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.17158 of 2025 respectively. The applicant's case is identical to the co-accused and he is also entitled to bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 23.07.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jeet Narayan Dubey, Shyam Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jitendra Sharma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed. 6. Let the applicant -Jitendra Sharma involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions: (i). The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. September 8, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 30501 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad