[2026:JHHC:10868] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3031 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Kumar aged about 23 years, son of Krishna Nandan Ram, resident of R.I.T. Mirudih, P.O. & P.S.- R.I.T. District Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.275 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.07 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 127 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109, 324 (4), 125 (a), 125 (b), 352, 351 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and his family by assaulting them by means of stones. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has already been submitted but no witness has been examined in this case as yet and because of previous enmity, this false case has been foisted. It is then submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.114 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.09.2025 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.275 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.07 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-16.04.2026-Animesh/