[2026:RJ-JP:15503] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6353/2026 M/s Rajul Kumar, Through Its Properietor Rajul Kumar, W/o Shri Vikas Kumar, House No. D-25/g, Second Floor, New Delhi South Extension-2, Andrews Ganj, South Delhi, Delhi-110049 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur- 302005 Through Its Managing Director. 2. Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Dholpur, Rajasthan-328001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 15/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :- "The humble petitioner most humbly prays that your lordship may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow his petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction order as under: (i) Direct respondent No.1 to decide the Application for restoration under Rule 24(3) of RIICO Disposal of Land Rules, 1979 of Plot No. 95(A), RIICO Industrial Area, Growth Centre, Dholpur as expeditiously as possible within a period of 2 weeks after giving a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (ii) Such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and [2026:RJ-JP:15503] (2 of 3) [CW-6353/2026] in the circumstances of the present case may be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. Mr. Aditya Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that aggrieved by the cancellation of allotment made by the respondents vide order dated 26.06.2024, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the First Appellate Authority, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO), which came to be decided in an ex-parte manner vide order dated 28.05.2025, which was then challenged by the petitioner before this Court by filing the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11295/2025, titled as M/s Rajul Kumar Vs. Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited & Anr.. The said writ petition came to be disposed of vide order dated 10.09.2025, whereby the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by the First Appellate Authority, RIICO was quashed and set aside and the matter was remitted back to the Appellate Authority to hear and decide the appeal on its merits after hearing learned counsel for the parties expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the said order. 3. Learned counsel submits that despite approaching the Appellate Authority again and also filing a representation before the said Appellate Authority seeking restoration of its allotment, no order has been passed by the respondent - authorities till date, and thus, learned counsel submits that the directions be issued to respondent – authorities to decide the application and the [2026:RJ-JP:15503] (3 of 3) [CW-6353/2026] representation submitted by the petitioner within a time bound manner, strictly in accordance with law. 4. Considering the limited submissions so made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without delving into the merits of the matter, respondent No.1 – RIICO is directed to decide the application filed by the petitioner for restoration of Plot No.95(A), RIICO Industrial Area, Growth Centre, Dholpur, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 7. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s application and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said application in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /3