Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6102 (KAR)

SMT. M AKKARAJAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/35474/2025 · 2026-03-18

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15913 WP No. 35474 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 35474 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SMT. M. AKKARAJAMMA W/O LATE RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT BALLAGERE VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB, 1ST FLOOR, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15913 WP No. 35474 of 2025 MAHARSHI ARVINDA BHAVAN, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARSIH, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATIONS ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF THE KIADB ACT, 1966, DATED 28/11/2024 BEARING NO.C1155SPQ2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(4) OF THE KIADB ACT, 1966 DATED 29/05/2025 BEARING NO.CI155SPQ2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S LAND IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal which reads as hereunder: "It is submitted that, the Petitioner has decided to withdraw the writ petition filed before this Hon'ble Court by challenging the acquisition notification issued by the Respondents in respect of Sy.No.27/1, 27/3 and 12/4 of Ballagere - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15913 WP No. 35474 of 2025 Village, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk. Hence, the Petitioner prays that, this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition and direct the Respondents to pay the monetary compensation to the Petitioner in respect of the above said lands in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes that they would proceed further and pass an award in accordance with law and take steps for disbursal of compensation as per law. 3. Though the memo has been filed seeking for withdrawal of the petition, in light of the stand of the respondents, petition is disposed of in terms of the above discussion. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR