Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6100 (PNJ)

VARINDER GILL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/11740/2026 · 2026-03-09

Subhas Mehla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

   -1-      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH  CRM-M-11740-2026 Decided on: 09.03.2026    …...Petitioner Versus    …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora                   **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)                         !" # $  %         &        '() "**   $#  # +      $,- *, -   !   & "&&    ,!"- # $     $           #           . & /  0   ' 1                             2   3       4  &     4     2  #        )*5####63 7   4  , -!     &   4       4  SONIA PURI 2026.03.18 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -2-      $  8                           & 4         9                     9      4              4 &  ,-  2  4              &    &   &        8      &      &   :        &        "   4  +  (                          3                    &       2  4   there are specific allegations against the present petitioner in the aforesaid FIR as he alongwith co-accused visited the house of the complainant and allured the complainant to part with gold articles weighing 40 grams (04 tolas), and also handed over visa which after verification, was found to be fake; however, after some intervention of the respectables, the petitioner returned Rs.2.05 lakh to the petitioner but the remaining amount is yet to be recovered from the present petitioner & his co-accused; notice was issued to the petitioner to join the investigation and the same was served upon him through his wife but the petitioner failed to join the same. Custodial interrogation is required in the present matter to properly investigate the matter regarding SONIA PURI 2026.03.18 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -3-      forged and fabricated documents. Moreover, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail, in view of his conduct as he failed to join the investigation. ;  <     =    2    :  4                                               2  3      4              #  :)*5####63 92      4 2  2    %     9        4 & 4 4          4       4 &9                   4 2    4   2 9         ) #+%  2   44 #   &                      9              >          2   &  44 #    %2           4  (           <?   4  .  4 1   4          &    4&     4      4   4&        4            &     SONIA PURI 2026.03.18 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -4-        2 2 3   &      &2      4&    4    5  =  2   &                                  &   &          & !"#!""$  10. Nothing observed herein shall be construed as  7   & .    4&     (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 09.03.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO  Whether Reportable: YES/NO  SONIA PURI 2026.03.18 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document