Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6099 (PNJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. VIVEK AGGARWAL

COCP/391/2026 · 2026-03-19

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[107] Anil Kuma Vivek Agg Education, Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] amounting ‘X’. Origi the petition [2] passed. Th [3] disposed of 19.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-391 Date of De Kumar son of Shri Rampal Sharma Versus k Aggarwal, IRS, Director, Elementary ation, Haryana, Panchkula HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate fo Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DA **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel ha nting to ₹ 25,000/- each. Copy of sam Original demand drafts have been su etitioner. In view of the above, no fur d. The present contempt petition stan All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 391-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 19.03.2026 …Petitioner entary ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN ate for the petitioner. ar, DAG, Haryana. el has produced demand draft(s same are taken on record as Mark een supplied to learned counsel for no further orders are required to be n stands disposed off. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No s) Mark el for to be tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.23 18:00 I agree to specified portions of this document