1 2026:CGHC:16232 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 486 of 2021 1 - Santuram S/o Rungu Aged About 71 Years Caste Schedule Tribe Uraon, R/o Village Hirapur, Tehsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Padma, W/o Shishupal, D/o Parsu Aged About 46 Years Caste Schedule Tribe Uraon, R/o Village Gopalpur, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Harilal, S/o Gulab, Aged About 36 Years Caste Schedule Tribe Uraon, R/o Village Hirapur, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mansai, S/o Bhakhlu Aged About 71 Years Caste Schedule Tribe Uraon, R/o Village Gopalpur, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.09 10:49:19 +0530 2 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Wrd, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer Wrd Bilaspur, (Kalma Bairaj) District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer Wrd (Kalma Bairaj) Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub Divisional Officer (R.) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhra District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Government Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 08/04/2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that during pendency of the writ petition, the compensation has been granted to the petitioners, therefore, he does not want to press the instant writ petition, as the same has become infructuous. 3 3. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the respondent counsel. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit