CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 S.Thirunavukarasu Son of Mr.Sathyanantham, No.61, Mettu Colony, Gummidipoondi (Post) and Taluk, Tiruvallur District-601 201. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police G2-Periamet Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.177 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.177 of 2026 on the file of G2-Periampet Police, Chennai and pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner(s): M/s. S.Magimai Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), 109 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.177 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a dispute between college students regarding a 'Route-Head', the petitioner, along with other co-accused, chased the de facto complainant and assaulted him with a knife at the Metro Station. Hence, the present case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner’s name was not found place in the FIR and that he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the co-accused was released on bail before the Trial Court. He further submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner has no previous cases pending against him. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 6. Considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital, co-accused has already been released on bail before the Trial Court, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 15 days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 24-08-2026 DRL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. 2. The Inspector of Police G2-Periamet Police Station, Chennai. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 N.RAMESH, J. DRL CRL OP No. 23587 of 2026 24-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis