HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33096 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No.1 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the subject matter of the present writ petition is pending consideration before the respondent no.3-Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj by way of application enclosed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition for issuance of the character certificate and the same has not been decided till date. 3. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel contends that the matter can very well be considered by the competent authority and therefore, an appropriate direction be issued to the competent authority to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 9, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pandey, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Vipul Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad