Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4313/2026 Shayar Mehrat S/o Shri Bala Mehrat, Aged About 81 Years, R/o - Mohanpura, Tehsil Nasirabad District Ajmer, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director
2. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Srinagar, District Ajmer Rajasthan
3. Junior Engineer (O And M), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Srinagar, District Ajmer Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sudesh Panwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaivardhan Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 23/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length made a limited prayer that since the respondents without issuing any show cause notice to the petitioner as regards the change of the category of the electricity supply connection have changed the category and made the demand, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents-corporation as regards his grievances of change of the category of the electricity supply connection and demanding the charges according to the changed category.
[2026:RJ-JP:12080] (2 of 2) [CW-4313/2026]
2. Taking into consideration the material facts of this case that no notice for change of category of the electricity supply connection is said to have been issued to the petitioner by the respondents-corporation, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the petitioner is allowed to make a representation to the respondent-authorities as regards his grievances pertaining to change of the category of electricity supply connection and demand of charges as per the changed category.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent-authorities within a period of ten days from today.
4. In case the respondents-authorities receive any such representation from the petitioner within above given period of ten days, the same may be considered and decided by the respondents-authorities after allowing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as early as possible by a reasoned and speaking
order.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Court also directs the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner including the disconnection of the electricity supply connection till disposal of the representation, if the same is submitted by the petitioner within above given time of ten days.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /283 S