IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.4901 of 2026 Decided on 22nd April 2026 Raj Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the basic grievance of the petitioners is that in terms of Annexure P-2 only notional benefits stand conferred upon the petitioners, whereas, they are entitled to actual benefits as from the date when they stand regularized. 2. In light of the fact that there is no challenge to Annexure P-2, in terms whereof notional benefits stand conferred upon the petitioners, on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are allowed to 2 withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 22, 2026 (Vinod)