HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20045 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Even after service of notice, no one has appeared on behalf of the informant's side. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record of the case. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 03 of 2026, under Sections 351(3), 352, 336(3), 338, 318(4), 238, 61(2) BNS, Police Station- Hafizpur, District- Hapur, during pendency of the trial in the court concerned. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. The FIR of the present case was lodged against twelve persons. It is alleged in the FIR that due to fraudulent act of the accused persons firm of the informant has suffered with the loss of about Rs. Four crores. It is next submitted that applicant is having no concern with the allegations levelled against him and he has not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. It is submitted that applicant was appointed as a quality manager and his work only check the quality of material. It is next submitted that during investigation, bank statement was also collected by the investigating officer, in which Rs. 18,000 was credited by the co- accused Manjeet @ D.K. Tewatiya. No specific allegations have been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Yadav, Munna Yadav, Naveen Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Krishna Kant Dubey, Santosh Kumar Dubey Abhishek Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) levelled against the applicant. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter. Co-accused D.K. Teotia has been granted anticipatory bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.2.2026 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 482 BNSS No. 1590 of 2026. Other co- accused namely Ram Singh, Amar Singh, Lokendra, and Ankit Singh have also granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 24.8.2026, 24.8.2026, 31.8.2026 and 31.8.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 11041 of 2026, 10904 of 2026, 13676 of 2026 and 15012 of 2026, respectively. He next submitted that except the present case, the applicant is not having any other criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 23.3.2026. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record, evidence and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. Let applicant, Abhishek Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:- (i). The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of BAIL No. 20045 of 2026 2 which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 8, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 20045 of 2026 3 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad