2026:MHC:3448 WP No. 17992 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN WP No. 17992 of 2025 1. S.Vembu D/o.Sambandam, Examiner, Iii Additional District Sessions Court, Vridhchalam, Cudalore District. 2. Mangayarkarasi, D/o.Shanmugavelayudam, Examiner, District Munsif Cum J.M.Court Kurinchipadi, Cuddalore District. 3. Tamil Selvi, D/o.Dhandapani, Examiner, J.M.Court-i, Cuddalore. 4. Janakiraman, S/o.Muthulingam Examiner, Sub - Court, Panruti, Cuddalore District. 5. Saravanan, S/o.Pitchai Pilai, Examiner, Div.Magistrate Court, Neyveli, Cuddalore District. 6. Thaiyal Nayagi, W/o.Late Saravanan Examiner, Ii Additional District Sessions Court, Chidmabram, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary To Government Home (Court - Ii) Department For St George, Chennai - 600 009. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:3448 WP No. 17992 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The Registrar - General, High Court, Madras, 3. The Principal District Cum Special Judge, Cuddalore. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioners in the post of examiner from the date of initial appointment as Typist / Examiner and consequently absorb the petitioners as Junior Assistant pursuant to G.O.Ms. No.535, Home (Courts -V) Department dated 24/09/2024 and lace them in the appropriate place in the seniority list of Junior Assistant and grant them all consequential service and monetary benefits and grant such other further relief as this Honorable Court may deem fit in the circumstances arising out of the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Venkataramani, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent(s): Ms.Y.Kavitha,Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 MS.V.Sasi for Ms. Poonghulali for R2 t& R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the case of similarly placed persons were considered for absorption to the post of Junior Assistant. 2. Mr.Venkatramani, learned Senior Counsel would submit that though the issue is pending before the High Court, no final decision has been taken. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:3448 WP No. 17992 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 3. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the issue involves larger repercussion, since many number of employees in the same cadre are in service across the State of Tamilnadu. Therefore, the issues are to be considered by the High Court with reference to the rules as well as the High Court proceedings. However, at this juncture, it is not desirable for this Court to consider the direction as such sought for and the same cannot be granted. However, we request the Hon'ble High Court to decide the issues as expeditiously as possible on merits and in accordance with law. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. W.MP.20185/2025 is ordered on payment of separate court fee. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.R.,J.) 20-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vsi To 1.The Secretary To Government Home (Court - Ii) Department For St George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Registrar - General, High Court, Madras, 3.The Principal District Cum Special Judge, Cuddalore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:3448 WP No. 17992 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN, J. vsi WP No. 17992 of 2025 20-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis