[2026:RJ-JP:11610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 189/2026 Balram S/o Shri Shivram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Village Bhopar Tappa, P.S. Mahuwa, District Dausa (At Present In District Jail Dausa). ---Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. -----Non-Appellant 2. Xxxxxx W/o Gajaraj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Matasula, P.S. Todabheem, District Karoli (At Present Tenant At Indara Colony Mahuwa, P.S. Mahuwa, District Dausa). ---Complainant-Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2026 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 516/2025 Police Station Mahuwa, District Dausa for the offences under Sections 64(1) of BNS, 2023 and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 64(1), 331(6) of BNS, 2023 and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is aged approximately 28 years. It is submitted that the [2026:RJ-JP:11610] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-189/2026] appellant is son of the landlord and that on account of a land dispute, a false case is registered qua the appellant. It is further submitted that the appellant is in custody since 15.11.2025, the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time. It is submitted that prosecution story is not supported by any tangible evidences. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant criminal appeal and submitted that the medical report suggested that unless requisite FSL opinion is received, the plausibility that the coitus so occurred is consensual or otherwise cannot be ruled out. It is submitted that the statements tendered under Section 183 of BNSS are in consonance with the contents of FIR, which was immediately lodged. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, taking note of the submissions made before the learned Trial Court, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal appeal is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-239