1 2026:CGHC:15966-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 163 of 2026 1 - Shri Jitendra Kumar Banjara S/o Brijlal Banjara Aged About 42 Years R/o R-6/10 Rama Valley, Raipur Road Parsada, Police Station Chakarbhata Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Home Affairs, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarter Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Station House Office Police Station Civil Line, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Dr. Sanjay Banjare S/o Late Cherka Banjare Aged About 36 Years R/o Jarhabhata Om Nagar Bilaspur, Police Station Nagar Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.04.10 17:05:00 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08/04/2026 1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate, along with Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the Respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “10.1) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issued suitable writ or writs/ order for quashed the impugned FIR dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) in Crime No. 179/2026 offence punishable U/s 196,296,299,302,351,352 of B.N.S. 2023 registered in Police Station Civil Line Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 10.2) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel appearing on 3 behalf of the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail of appropriate remedy available to him under law. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copy, if any, filed in the petition be return back to the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok