Date of reserved for orders : 16.07.2026 Date of pronouncement : 24.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010717862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 638/2026 Between: 1. TALAPALA RAJESWARI, D/O. ETAMUKKALA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O. RAVULAKOLLU VARI STREET, RAMMURTHYPETA, KAVALI TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MANNEMALA SUKUMAR REDDY, S/o. Late Narayana Reddy, aged 55 years, R/o. Flat No. 504, Maruthi Grand Apartment, Teachers Colony, Musunuru Village, Kavali Town, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh-524201. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to direct the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali to expedite the disposal of the I.A. No. 193 of 2025 in O.S. No. 68 of 2025 pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali within the stipulated time period as this Hon'ble Court may fix in accordance with the law as well as in the light of the circular ROC.No.126/OPCELL-E/2025 dated 27.06.2025 issued by the Registry of this Honorable Court IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the e-courts status in O.S. No. 68 of 2025, on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali, SPSR Nellore District in the above C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. KOMARA PRUDHVI RAJ The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri V. Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Komara Prudhvi Raj, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The sole defendant in the suit O.S.No.68 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali, SPSR Nellore District, filed this civil revision petition (hereinafter referred to as ‘revision’) complaining that I.A.No.193 of 2025 has not been disposed of. 3. The respondent/plaintiff instituted O.S.No.68 of 2025 seeking perpetual injunction restraining the defendant, her men, assignees and her legal representatives from evicting the plaintiff forcibly from the plaint schedule property without following due process of law. 4. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.193 of 2025 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. The trial Court granted ad- interim injunction on 10.03.2025. 5. Thereafter, the revision petitioner/defendant filed a counter in I.A.No.193 of 2025 and reported ready for enquiry. However, the interlocutory application is being adjourned from time to time. Hence, the above revision was filed. 6. Considering the prayer in the revision, this Court called for information from the trial court regarding the stage of I.A.No.193 of 2025. 7. As seen from the information received through WhatsApp, pending the enquiry in I.A.No.193 of 2025, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.615 of 2025 to implead the proposed party as defendant No.2, and the said application was allowed on 30.06.2026, and a neat copy of the plaint was filed on 14.07.2026. 8. It is relevant to note that Order XXXIX Rule 3-A mandates that where an injunction is granted without giving notice to the opposite party, the Court shall endeavour to dispose of the application within thirty days from the date when the injunction was granted. If the Court is unable to do so, it shall record reasons for such inability. 9. In the present case, the ad-interim injunction was granted on 10.03.2025. Though the defendant has filed a counter and reported ready for enquiry, the application is still pending. 10. Given the discussion above, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the trial court to dispose of I.A.No.193 of 2025, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six weeks from the receipt of a copy of this order, keeping in view the mandate contained under Order XXXIX Rule 3-A C.P.C. as also Nama Ramaprasad vs Kristam Reddy Raju1. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: IKN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 1 2022 SCC OnLine AP 3240