Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6073 (JHR)

SUNNY KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS SUNNY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1626/2026 · 2026-04-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10754] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1626 of 2026 Sunny Kumar Gupta @ Sunny Kumar, aged about 26 years, Son of Suresh Saw, Resident of Village-Kadma, P.O. Kadma, P.S. Katkamdag, District-Hazaribag. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 15.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 205 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 323, 324, 325, 379, 454, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that recently the petitioner has received notice and thereafter he came to know about the present case. He next submits that the other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 5901 of 2023 by the co-ordinate bench. He further submits that in the FIR, the names of two Sunny Kumar have been disclosed and one of them has already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. So far as this petitioner is concerned, the father’s name has not been disclosed in the FIR. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that one criminal antecedent is there against the [2026:JHHC:10754] -2- present petitioner. 5. Considering that the other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. and even one Sunny Kumar has also been granted anticipatory bail and further having the criminal antecedent is not the sole criteria of allowing or rejecting the regular bail or anticipatory bail, in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-15.04.2026 Amitesh/-