Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6072 (JHR)

HASIM SHEIKH @ HASIM SEIKH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3015/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10872] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3015 of 2026 ------ Hasim Sheikh @ Hasim Seikh aged about 32 years son of Late Sarafat Shekh, resident of village- Kandra, P.O.- Ramnagar Garh, P.S.- Mahuda, District- Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of dacoity and looted gold and silver jewelry and cash of Rs. 4,50,000/- from the house, after beating mother and wife of the informant and also taken away Rs. 10-12 thousand from the shop of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner without putting the petitioner to the test identification parade. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2927 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.08.2025 as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 16.04.2026 Saroj/