- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21998 WP No. 12414 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 12414 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. MR. MUFADDAL SAHERWALLA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O HUSSAIN ABBAS SAHERWALA, R/AT NO.7, BURHANI HOUSE, 2ND CROSS, C.P.V. BLOCK, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 032. 2. SMT. SURBHI SRIVASTAVA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, D/O RANJAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, R/AT ASR SUNRISE APARTMENT, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, VINAYAK NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 063. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY R.T NAGAR P.S. OPPOSITE HMT GROUND, 80 FEET ROAD, P AND T COLONY, RT NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 032. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21998 WP No. 12414 of 2026 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NORTH DIVISION, BENGALURU NEAR SAVINDHANA CIRCLE, YESWANTHPUR, BENGALURU - 560 022. 3. MR. MOHAMMED AZHARUDDIN, AGED MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN R/AT 4TH MAIN ROAD, C.P.V. BLOCK, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 070. 4. MR. MD HARIS ASGER AGED MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN R/AT NO. 13, 7TH CROSS, GANGANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 2 TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AND HOLD THAT THE ACTIONS OF THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 2 IN MAKING PHONE CALLS AND DEMANDING THE APPEARANCE OF THE PETITIONERS ARE ILLEGAL, OPPOSED TO THE LAW AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21998 WP No. 12414 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate, on instructions, submits that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not summoned the petitioner in connection with any criminal case, as no complaint has been lodged by either of the parties. It is further submitted, on instructions, that the Station House Officer does not propose to summon either of the parties, since the dispute between them is essentially civil in nature. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21