1 / 2 2026:CGHC:17430 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 362 of 2026 1 - Arun Kumar Randhive S/o Late Bhaiyalal Randhive Aged About 57 Years R/o Near Gujrati Dharamsala, Near Takiyapara, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, (C.G.) 2 - Suryakant Randhive S/o Late Bhaiyalal Randhive Aged About 55 Years R/o Near Gujrati Dharamsala, Near Takiyapara, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, (C.G.) 3 - Prahlad Randhive S/o Late Bhaiyalal Randhive (Dead) Through Nil 3.1 - (A) Smt. Shalini Randhive W/o Prahlad Randhive Aged About 40 Years R/o Takiyapara, Durg (C.G.) 3.2 - (B) Pravin Randhive S/o Prahlad Randhive Aged About 18 Years R/o Takiyapara, Durg (C.G.) (As Now The Appellant No. 3 B Has Got Majority) ... Applicants versus Shyam Sunder Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Prabhudayal Khandelwal Aged About 70 Years R/o Gandhi Chowk Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, (C.G.) ... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Amit Nayak, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order On Board 16/04/2026 AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.04.16 18:11:39 +0530 2 / 2 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of SA No.548/2023, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 02/02/2026. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the above matter was listed on 02/02/2026 but due to some bonafide mistake, he could not appear before this Court and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration, the submission made by the counsel for the applicants and the pleadings made in the MCC, it is allowed. SA No.548/2023 is restored to its original number subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 3,000/- as cost by the applicants payable to Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep