Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6071 (CAL)

KRISHNA SEN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/4032/2025 · 2026-01-15

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 48 January 15, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 4032 of 2025 An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Krishna Sen … petitioner Mr. Santanu Talukdar Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Ms. Shalini Bairagi Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty … for the petitioner Mr. Soumik Ganguly Ms. Afreen Begum … for the State Report filed by the State is taken on record. Despite service no one appears on behalf of the alleged victim. It appears that a proclamation has been issued. Perused the statement of the minor victim recorded before the learned Magistrate. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client would not like to press this application. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)