RAVI RAJAK ALIAS RAVI SHANKAR RAJAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1597/2026 · 2026-03-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 607 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 607 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:6463] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 1597 of 2026
Ravi Rajak @ Ravi Shankar Rajak, Aged about 30 years S/o- Jainarayan Rajak, resident of Village-Kharkokundi, P.O+P.S- Narayanpur, Dist.- Jamtara
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Choudhary , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP
02 / 11.03.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cybercrime P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025 instituted under Sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with section 66B, C, D of the Information Technology Act and 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime by posing himself as Phone Pe officer and one mobile phone with sim card was seized from the possession of the petitioner which was used in creating several E- wallets. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and no victim has been traced out in this case so far and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 24.12.2025, as mentioned in
para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cybercrime P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 11.03.2026
Smita/-