Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6069 (KAR)

DEVANSHU PRAVEEN SAHOO v. STATE BY

CRL.P/4504/2026 · 2026-03-24

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16819 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4504 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. DEVANSHU PRAVEEN SAHOO S/O UMESH CHANDRA SAHOO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 04 NAKSHATRA APARTMENT VAIKUNTA LAYOUT LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM AECS LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 037. 2. UMESH CHANDRA SAHOO AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O BALARAM SAHOO RESIDING AT NEW COLONY KENDUJHARGOAD, KENDUJHAR TOWN MADHAPUR, KENDUJHAR ORISSA – 758 001. 3. SUMANA SAHOO W/O UMESH CHANDRA SAHOO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NEW COLONY KENDUJHARGOAD, KENDUJHAR TOWN MADHAPUR, KENDUJHAR ORISSA – 758 001. …PETITIONERS (BY MS. ANJANA C. H., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16819 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2026 AND: 1. STATE BY H.A.L POLICE STATION SECTOR 3, MARATHAHALLI BENGALURU – 560 037 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SMT. NIBEDITA DAS AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RICH HOMES APARTMENT ITI LAYOUT, 27TH CROSS SECTOR-2, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.112/2024 REGISTERED BY HAL P.S., PENDING BEFORE THE XXIX ACMM COURT, MAYO HALL, BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A), 506, 406, 420 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16819 CRL.P No. 4504 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent No.2 files a memo indicating that the parties to the lis have resolved their matrimonial dispute and respondent No.2 is not interested in pursuing the proceedings. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO The Respondent No.2 in the aforementioned petition submits that a complaint was filed against the Petitioners, who are the husband & parents -in-law of the Respondent No.2 and consequently a FIR in Crime a No. 112/2024 was registered by the Respondent No.1 police. That the Petitioners No.1 & Respondent No.2 have resolved their dispute and therefore the she does not wish to pursue the criminal proceedings against the Petitioners.” In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as settled out of the Court. I.A.No.1/2026 is also disposed, as a consequence. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 106/CT:SS