Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 60675 (MAD)

R.Varudaraj v. The District Collector

WP/32014/2026 · 2026-08-13

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 32014 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 32014 of 2026 R.Varudaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2. The Tahsildhar, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal., 3. The Surveyor, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to rectify the Field measurement Book (FMB) Sketch by deleting the erroneous depiction of an extent of Ac.0.15 cents as a pathway in the petitioner’s land comprised in Survey No.96/3 measuring Ac.1.28.50 cents situated at Kalyani Village, Namakkal Taluk and to bring the FMB Sketch in Conformity with the Patta, Survey Records and other connected revenue records. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.A.Mariappan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32014 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 10.06.2026 before the respondents to rectify the Field measurement Book (FMB) Sketch by deleting the erroneous depiction of an extent of Ac.0.15 cents as a pathway on his land comprised in Survey No.96/3 measuring Ac.1.28.50 cents situated at Kalyani Village, Namakkal Taluk and to bring the FMB Sketch in Conformity with the Patta, Survey Records and other connected revenue records. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 10.06.2026 will be considered within a period of six weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32014 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2. The Tahsildhar, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal., 3. The Surveyor, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32014 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 32014 of 2026 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis