Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6066 (UTT)

MEHARBAN AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/1086/2026 · 2026-05-25

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS MCRC No.2/2026 (Amendment Application) In C528 No.1086 of 2026 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant through VC. 2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Amendment application has been moved by the learned counsel for the Applicant with a prayer that “consequential proceedings of Sessions Trial No.37 of 2025 pending before the learned Additional District Judge/F.T.S.C., Roorkee, District Haridwar” were wrongly mentioned in the judgment and order dated 25.05.2026 as there is no session trial pending against the present Applicants. 4. The amendment appears to be bona fide. 5. Consequently, the amendment application is allowed. The word “Sessions Trial No.37 of 2025 pending before the learned Additional District Judge/F.T.S.C., Roorkee, District Haridwar” is hereby deleted from paragraph nos.4 and 11, of the judgment and order dated 25.05.2026. 6. Today’s order will be made part of the judgment and order dated 25.05.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 29.05.2026 Nitesh/