Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 60656 (MAD)

NO FOOD WASTE v. The Commissioner

WP/34058/2026 · 2026-08-20

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 34058 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.08.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP No. 34058 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.37455 of 2026 No Food Waste bearing Registration No.71/BK4/2015 having its Corporate Office at No.19/33 1st Floor, 50 Feet Road, Krishnaswamy nagar Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore – 641 045. Represented by its Managing Trustee Mr.A.G.Padamanaban ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner Thiruthani Municipality Thiruthani Tiruvallur – 631 209. … Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 17.08.2026 in relation to Tender ID.No.2026_MA WS_688935_1, Tender Reference No.1453/2022/E1 on its own merits and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the tender, within such time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.Manikanda Prabhu .J For Respondent: Mr.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel ***** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34058 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 O R D E R Mr. P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. 2. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of his representation dated 17.08.2026 relating to Tender ID No.2026_MAWS_688935_1 and Tender Reference No.1453/2022/E1. The tender was issued for supply of breakfast to school students. 3. The petitioner states that he was technically qualified and his technical bid was accepted. However, the technical bid submitted by another bidder, namely, M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Limited, was also accepted, though, according to the petitioner, the said bidder does not satisfy the technical qualification requirements. Therefore, the petitioner has sought rejection of the said bidder’s technical bid. 4. The learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner’s representation will be considered in accordance with law within the time fixed by this Court. He further submits that the acceptance of the petitioner’s technical bid will also be considered. 5. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34058 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 17.08.2026 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the concerned bidders. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 20.08.2026 Speaking / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mk To The Commissioner Thiruthani Municipality Thiruthani Tiruvallur – 631 209. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34058 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR J. mk WP No. 34058 of 2026 20.08.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis