[2026:RJ-JP:9654] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4080/2026 1. Shyodan Ram S/o Sugana Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village And Post Badalwas Shesma Ki Dhani Teh. Sikar Rural Distt. Sikar. 2. Shyam Singh S/o Mangej Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Mandha Teh. Dataramgarh District Sikar. 3. Gopal Singh S/o Bajrang Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Ward No. 2 Palwas Teh. Dhod Distt. Sikar. 4. Ashok Singh S/o Roop Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 579, Durga Colony, Polo Ground Ke Pichhe, Rampura Road Distt. Sikar. 5. Gopal Singh S/o Keshar Mal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o V- P Bhagatpura Teh. Dataramgarh District Sikar. 6. Mahesh Chandra S/o Ramlal Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 41, Veer Teja Colony Nawalgarh Road Sikar Distt. Sikar. 7. Harphool Singh S/o Lachha Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Rampura, Nathawatpura Distt. Sikar. 8. Ramniwas S/o Jawahar Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Bajroli Teh. Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar. 9. Dinesh Kumar S/o Bishan Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Gumana Ka Bas Post Katrathal Teh. And Distt. Sikar. 10. Ganpat Singh S/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Insp-A Ganganagar Village Baguwala Teh. Raysinagar Distt. Ganganagar. 11. Surender Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Village Chalkoi Baneerotan Teh. And Distt. Churu. 12. Shaitan Singh Rathore S/o Prabhu Singh, R/o 55/51, Pratap Nagar Lohakhan Ajmer Distt. Ajmer. 13. Nasib Baig S/o Sajan Baig, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Muglo Ki Dhani Village Baghpura Teh. Aradka Distt. Ajmer. 14. Rajendra Singh S/o Gordhan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village And Post Hirna, Teh. Fatehpur Distt. Sikar. 15. Balbeer Singh S/o Prahlad Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village And Post Doojod Teh. Dhod Distt. Sikar. [2026:RJ-JP:9654] (2 of 3) [CW-4080/2026] 16. Vijay Singh Gena S/o Rameshwarlal Gaina, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village And Post Lodsar, Teh. Sunjangarh Distt. Churu. 17. Rajbeer Singh S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 49 Years, Village And Post Ishoroda Tehsil And Distt. Khairthal Tijara. 18. Siya Ram S/o Jormal, Village Beenjla Post Mathurahera Teh. Kathumar Distt. Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman And Managing Director. 2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sikar Depot, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 4. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Ajmer Depot, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 5. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Churu Depot, District Churu (Rajasthan) 6. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tijara Depot, District Khairthal Tijara (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that since, the issue involved in the instant writ petition has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dauji Prasad & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan State Road [2026:RJ-JP:9654] (3 of 3) [CW-4080/2026] Transport Corporation & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14614/2024) decided on 30.10.2025, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit representation. 2. In view of limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit representation before the respondents and in case, after examining the representation, the respondents find that cases of the petitioners are also covered by the judgments in the case of Dauji Prasad (Supra) as well as Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8810/2014) decided on 25.01.2017, referred in the order dated 30.10.2025, then similar benefits shall be granted to the petitioners. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /48