Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 31202 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 31202 of 2026 Yuvaraj S/o.Rathinam No.1/678, Mariyamman Kovil Street Ammanikondalampatti Salem -636 010 ..Petitioner Vs
1. The District Collector Collectorate Office, Fort Main Road Salem-636 001
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office at Near LIC India, Bhavani Road DAM Mettur Taluk Salem -636 401
3. The Thasildar Omalur Taluk, Salem
4. Lakshmanan S/o.Manickam No.7/14,Manathaal Olapatti village Near Mariyamman Kovil bus stop Omalur Taluk, Salem __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31202 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus direct the 2nd and 3rdrespondents to take appropriate steps to change the name of patta wrongly issued in favour of 4th respondent instead of issuing in the name of Muthupadayachi alias Muthaagoundan for the property comprised in S.No.214/13 to the extent of 0.04.50 hectare, 0.11 cent in respect of patta No.920 situated at Manathaal village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District based on the representation dated 27.6.2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.N.Nagarjuna For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sivavarthanan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3
ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2026.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he submitted a representation dated 27.06.2026 to the respondents 2 and 3, seeking appropriate steps to change the name in the patta, which had been wrongly issued in favour of the 4th __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31202 of 2026 respondent, and to issue the same in the name of Muthupadayachi @ MuthaaGoundan, the petitioner's grandfather, in respect of the property comprised in S.No.214/13, measuring an extent of 0.04.50 hectare (0.11 cent), covered under Patta No.920, situated at Manathaal Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. However, the said representation has not been considered till date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.
3. Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that the 3rd respondent, being the competent authority, would consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of six weeks.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the 3rd respondent/Tahsildar, Omalur Taluk, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent and affording them an opportunity of personal __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31202 of 2026 hearing, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 07-08-2026 Asi To
1. The District Collector Collectorate Office, Fort Main Road Salem-636 001
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office at Near LIC India, Bhavani Road DAM Mettur Taluk, Salem -636 401
3. The Thasildar Omalur Taluk, Salem. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31202 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi WP No. 31202 of 2026 07-08-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis