Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6060 (BOM)

SAGAR LAXMAN MAAKE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/4341/2026 · 2026-09-02

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 11-WP-4341-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4341 OF 2026 Sagar Laxman Maake … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra And Ors. ... Respondent __________ Mr. Murtaza Najmi a/w Mr. Jackya Jain, Mr. Dilip Shukla, Ms. Priya Pandey, Ms. Farida najmi, Ms. Nancy Kanungo, Ms. Arefa Siddiquie, Mr. Nasrah Ansari for Petitioner. Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Nisha Valani for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Amrendra Sinha a/w Mr. Pankaj G. for Respondent No. 3. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PC : 1) Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that he will exercise his remedy of applying for anticipatory bail in the subject matter of this case. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with such liberty. Permission is granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with such liberty. 2) It is made clear that withdrawal of this petition shall Sagar Magar SAGAR SANTOSH MAGAR Digitally signed by SAGAR SANTOSH MAGAR Date: 2026.09.03 14:26:42 +0530 2 of 2 11-WP-4341-2026 not come in the way of the Petitioner to pursue the remedy of anticipatory bail and if such an application is preferred, it shall be decided on its merits in accordance with law. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)