VISHAL MISHRA S/O SHRI UDAY NARAYAN MISHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/950/2026 · 2026-03-17
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 606 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 606 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11279] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 950/2026 Vishal Mishra S/o Shri Uday Narayan Mishra, Aged About 31 Years, R/o New Trimurti Kichan And Gift Amporiyam, Joshi Marg, Kalwar Road, Jothwara, Jaipur, (Raj.) (Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 17/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 138/2025 registered at Police Station Banipark, Jaipur West for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since long; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars, and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
[2026:RJ-JP:11279] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-950/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application but confirms the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the
learned counsel for petitioner that recovery has already been effected; charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Vishal Mishra S/o Shri Uday Narayan Mishra is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/64