Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:16995
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5562 of 2021 1 - Ayodhya Banjare Mohan Lal Banjare Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Mandharkala, Baloda Bazar, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 2 - Dilip Sahu S/o Toran Sahu Aged About 58 Years R/o Kirvai, Post - Damakheda, Post Kirvai, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department of Co-Operative Society, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society, Balodabazar - Bhatapara, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 3 - Chief Executive Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank Maryadit, Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dharmendra Sharma S/o Late Gambhir Lal Sharma R/o Village Kirvai, Post Damakheda, Tehsil - Simga, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 5 - Rishi Kumar Sharma S/o Late Gambhir Lal Sharma R/o Village Kirvai, Post Damakheda, Tehsil - Simga, District Balodabazar - Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 6 - District Co Operative Central Bank Maryadit Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None in two rounds. For State For Respondents No.3 & 6. : : Mr. R.C.S. Deo, Panel Lawyer Mr. Nirala Gupta, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE
2
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13/04/2026
1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition against the Cooperative Society.
2. This petition is liable to be dismissed on two counts. Firstly, a writ petition against a Cooperative Society is not maintainable. Secondly, the petitioners have not challenged any specific order, and the decision regarding the allocation of workers was taken back in the year 2021.
3. It is further noted that any decision with regard to the alleged grievance was taken back in the year 2021.
4. Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed. Sd/-
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
JUDGE Nadim