1 2026:CGHC:17481 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 629 of 2020 1. Mehtar Kotangale S/o Shri Nasru Kotangale, Aged About 47 Years R/o Dongargarh, Danteshwari Para, Indira Ward No. 2 District Rajanandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Special Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, New Mantralaya Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Commissioner, Municipal Council Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3. Collector, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For State : Ms. Prachi Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16.04.2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the respondents to regularize his services. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.04.16 18:22:38 +0530 2 already preferred a representation before the respondent authority and he may be allowed to pursue the representation/he may be allowed to make a representation in the light of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court with regard to regularization of daily wages employees before the respondent authority. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. The petitioner is at liberty to pursue his representation/he may be allowed to make a representation in the light of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court with regard to regularization of daily wages employees before the Municipal Council Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) and the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law. 5. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish