Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10804/2025 Randheer S/o Maruram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Himataniyo Ki Dhani, Sirmandi, Police Station Osiyia, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar, District Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 25/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 201/2024 registered at Police Station Sarola District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 07.10.2024 and that there are no no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. It is submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter as Investigating Officer statement made on 15.01.2026, is not supported the prosecution story.
3. Per contra, learned Special Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the
[2026:RJ-JP:12622] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10804/2025] present is a case where contraband recovered is much higher than the prescribed the commercial quantity and provisions enshrined under Section 37 of the NDPS Act would be attracted.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that recovered quantity of the contraband is more than the prescribed commercial quantity; that rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act would be applicable in the present case; and looking to the overall
facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed, at this stage.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /20