Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6053 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR JAJORIA S/O SHRI RAMESH CHAND JAJORIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11913/2024 · 2026-03-25

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12621] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11913/2024 Ashok Kumar Jajoria S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Jajoria, aged about 45 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Ramrajpura Rakhri, Ajmer Road, Sodala, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur. Raj. 2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj. Department, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Gaharana with Mr. Ankur Nagar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 25/03/2026 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for seeking direction against the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner on the applied post as per advertisement dated 25.03.2013. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an application form pursuant to advertisement dated 25.03.2013, yet till this date, fate of his application has not been informed to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that in the year 2017, a decision was taken to withdraw some of the advertisements, however, advertisement No.981 dated 25.03.2013 has not been withdrawn so far. [2026:RJ-JP:12621] (2 of 2) [CW-11913/2024] 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the record. 5. The instant writ petition filed by the petitioner is totally misconceived and also suffers from delay and latches. Petitioner is relying upon information given in the year 2017 and has filed writ petition in the year 2024, no explanation whatsoever much less than sufficient explanation, has been given by the petitioner for filing the present writ petition with such a long and unexplainable delay. 6. In view of above, there is no scope for interference in the instant writ petition and the same, is hereby, dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/2