M/S DURGA PARAMESHWARI MOTORS v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
WP/8061/2026 · 2026-04-29
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6048 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6048 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24069 WP No. 8061 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 8061 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S DURGA PARAMESHWARI MOTORS R/BY ITS PROP. SRI RAVISHANKAR SHERIGAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, UNIT AT MAIN ROAD, FIRST FLOOR, KUSHMANDINI COMPLEX, BAJAGOLLI, KARKALA, UDUPI-574104
ALSO AT RAVISHANKAR SHERIGAR, S/O. GOPAL SHERIGAR, R/AT LALITHA MALA, PERADKA, BAJAGOLI POST, KARKALA TALUK-574122. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHWETHA NAYAK N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BANK OF INDIA HEAD OFFICE AT 112, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU-560002 KARNATAKA STATE BRANCH OFFICE AT MALLESHWARAM, 18TH CROSS, BENGALURU-560055 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MALINI VINAY, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER REJECTING RECALL APPLICATION VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 06.01.2026 IN O.A.
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24069 WP No. 8061 of 2026
NO.1946/2023 BEFORE HON’BLE DRT, BENGALURU AND DIRECTION TO DRT TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO FILE THE WRITTEN STATEMENT AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer.
“Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to: i. Certiorari to quash the impugned order rejecting recall application vide Annexure-A dated 06.01.2026 in O.A.No.1946/2023 before Hon’ble DRT Bangalore; ii. Direction to DRT to permit the petitioner to file the written statement; iii. And grant such other relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in such circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without giving an opportunity an order was passed by the DRT on 06.01.2026 by dismissing applications as there was no representation. It is submitted that the advocate did not represent before the Tribunal due to oversight.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24069 WP No. 8061 of 2026
3.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent-Bank submits that Original Application was
disposed of on 17.04.2026 itself and the order dated 06.01.2026 merged with the final order. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.
4. Having heard the learned counsels on either side, perused the material on record. Considering the fact that the Original Application itself is disposed of, the order impugned dated 06.01.2026 merged with the final order. The remedy available to the petitioner is to question the final order. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to question the
order that is passed in Original Application. ii. All pending I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17