CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 1. Ajith 2. Ravi ..Petitioners Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram. Crime.No.29 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime.No.454 of 2026 on the file of respondent pending investigation. For Petitioners: Mr.K.Karthik For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 118(1), 296(b) @ 109 (1), 296(b) of BNS in Crime No.29 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 seek bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that when the Village Administrative Officer surveyed entire property situated in Nemilli village and fixed boundaries for each and every property, thereon the de facto complainant adjusted and fixed the marking stone in the petitioner’s property for which, the petitioners questioned and assaulted the de-facto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He further submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that the injured person is still undergoing treatment in the hospital. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances, and the nature of allegation levelled against these petitioners and as contended by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured is still undergoing treatment in the hospital, this Court is of the firm view that it is not appropriate to consider the bail application at this stage. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 07-08-2026 SHL To: 1. The Inspector of Police Sriperumbudur Police Station, Kancheepuram. 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN J. SHL CRL OP No. 21815 of 2026 07-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis