Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6047 (KAR)

SUMAIYA SAIF v. MS GLOBAL TECH SOLUTION

MFA/6700/2025 · 2026-04-08

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6700 OF 2025 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SUMAIYA SAIF D/O SYED SAIFUDDIN AHMED AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT NEAR KAUSARNAGAR MASJID KAUSARNAGAR R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU - 32 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.V. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MS GLOBAL TECH SOLUTION REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI SIDDARTH DHURKA R/AT 54/1 AND 54/2 8TH CROSS KUMARA PARK WEST CENTRAL STREET BENGALURU - 560 020 BENGALURU - 560 078 2. SRI RAKESH KUMAR DHURKA AGED MAJOR R/AT 54/1 AND 54/2 8TH CROSS KUMARA PARK WEST CENTRAL STREET BENGALURU- 560020 BENGALURU - 560 078. Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 3. THE MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE KRUSHI BHVAN NEAR HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.C. VRUSHABHENDRAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3 VIDE ORDER DATED 05.01.2026, NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 21.08.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.95/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, ACJM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER, MACT-15, BENGALURU (SCCH-15), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 21.08.2024 passed in MVC.No.95/2021 on the file of the learned XIII Additional Small Causes Judge ACJM Court of Small Causes and Member MACT- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 15, Bengaluru (SCCH-15), seeking enhancement of compensation. 2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.3/Insurance Company. The ranks of the parties are retained as per Tribunal for the sake of convenience. 3. The petitioner/injured claimant met with an accident on 16.11.2020 and filed petition before the Tribunal for compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-. The Tribunal considering the entire evidence on record granted an amount of Rs.3,31,570/- with interest at the rate of 6% p.a., from the date of filing the petition till the date of deposit. Being aggrieved by the said order, this appeal is filed and mainly contended that she was admitted in the hospital as an inpatient for 3 days. She sustained various injuries and also examined the doctor as PW3 and he assessed the disability of 35% to the right arm and 12% to the whole body. But the Tribunal erred in taking the same as 6%. The Tribunal granted meager amounts under the other heads and the interest is to be granted at the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 higher rate and thus, requested for enhancement of compensation. 4. Though the petitioner stated that he was working in a private company and earning Rs.30,000/- per month, she has not filed any income proof. As she met with an accident in the year 2020, the Tribunal has rightly considered her notional income as Rs.14,500/- per month. The claimant was aged 23 years and the relevant multiplier is '18'. Ex.P8 is the wound certificate and Ex.P17 is the discharge summary. The petitioner also examined a doctor as PW3 and he is an orthopedic surgeon, he stated that the petitioner sustained right wrist distal radius fracture with inter-articular extension. He was treated at Kanva Sri Sai Hospital with ORIF for the right distal radius with LCP, she was regular follow up in the same hospital and the fracture united. The petitioner now complains of pain, stiffness in the right wrist, unable to lift weights, unable to do her routine work as before. She has healed scar over the right wrist region, restricted right wrist movements that is painful. Recent X-ray of the right wrist show united distal radius fracture with implant in situ. The doctor assessed that total disability of the right arm is 35% and whole body disability is - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 12%. He further stated that the claimant needs another surgery for removal of infant and the estimated cost of the surgery is thirty thousand. Therefore, this Court finds it to take 1/3rd of 35% i.e., 12% disability for the purpose of calculation. 14,500/- X 12 X 18 X 12% =3,75,840/- is to be granted towards loss of future earning capacity. The Tribunal has granted Rs.70,150/- towards medical expenses and it is confirmed. The claimant was hospitalized for a period of 3 days, considering the nature of injuries, period of hospitalization this Court finds to grant an amount of Rs.50,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.25,000/- for loss of amenities, Rs.30,000/- for transportation, extra nourishment and attendant charges. The claimant might not have done any other work at the time of treatment, therefore, the claimant is entitled for loss of income during laid up period is 14,500/- X 3 =Rs.43,500/-. The claimant is also entitled for Rs.30,000/- towards future medical expenses. 5. Thus in all, compensation awarded by this Court is as below: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 6. Hence, the appellant-claimant is entitled for a total compensation of Rs.6,24,590/- along with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. 7. In the result, the following order is passed: ORDER i. The appeal is allowed in part. ii. The judgment and award dated 21.08.2024 passed in MVC.No.95/2021 on the file of the learned XIII Additional Small Causes Judge ACJM Court of Small Causes and Member MACT-15, Bengaluru (SCCH-15), is modified. iii. The claimant is entitled to a sum of Rs.6,24,490/- along with interest at 6% p.a., from Sl.Nos. Particulars Amount in Rs. 1. Towards pain and suffering 50,000/- 2. Medical expenses 70,150/- 3. Future medical expenses 30,000/- 4. Towards loss of amenities 25,000/- 5. Towards food, nourishment and attendant charges 30,000/- 6. Towards loss of income during laid up period 43,500/- 7. Towards loss of future earning capacity 3,78,840/- Total 6,24,590,/- - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19443 MFA No. 6700 of 2025 the date of petition till the date of realization, instead of Rs.3,31,570/- granted by the tribunal. iv. Respondent No.3/Insurance Company has already deposited the award amount before the Tribunal. Therefore, respondent No.3/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation of Rs.2,92,920/- along with the interest at the rate of 6% within one month from the date of this order. v. On such deposit, petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount along with interest accrued on the same. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57