Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 32018 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 32018 of 2026 Mr.K.Muniraji, S/o.Krishnappa, No.1/10,Gumalapuram Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai (10) Taluk, Krishnagiri (31) District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent, to consider and dispose of the Petitioners application dated 15.04.2026, seeking necessary sub- division of the property situated at Gumalapuram Village, comprised in Survey No.24,measuring an extent of Ac.1.82 cents, assessed to an Asst.of Rs.3.10,subsequently covered under New Sub-Division Survey No.24/1,out of which an extent of Ac.0.08 cents is claimed by the petitioner, and covered under Patta No.490 pursuant to the registered Partition Deed bearing Document No.6355 of 2021 dated 29.07.2021 registered on the file of the sub- Registrar,Krishnagiri and consequently to effect necessary sub-division and issue a separate Patta in the Petitioners name in respect of his lawful share in the said property,after conducting due enquiry and providing an opportunity to all necessary and interested parties, if required and in accordance with law,within a time frame to be fixed by this honble court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 32018 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.S.Mujibur Rahman For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Maheshnath, GA Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 15.04.2026. 2. Mr.A.Maheshnath, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 15.04.2026 before the respondents, requesting them for sub-division of the subject land. However, the said application was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s application will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 32018 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 15.04.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 14-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai (10) Taluk, Krishnagiri (31) District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 32018 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 32018 of 2026 14-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis