Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6043 (UTT)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1362/2026 · 2026-05-25

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4138 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1362/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Abhijay Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganga Singh Negi, Additional CSC for the State. Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for UPNL. 2. According to petitioner, he was engaged on contract through outsourcing agency in Government Post Graduate College, Pithoragarh for some time and thereafter he served in same college after change of its status as Campus College of Soban Singh Jeena University, Almora. On his request, petitioner was relieved by Director of concerned college in 2023. 3. Petitioner now wants to be re-engaged in same college, namely, Govt. Post Graduate College, Pithoragarh. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner was a contract employee, engaged through outsourcing, therefore he has no vested right of re-appointment. He, however, submits that if petitioner makes representation before the competent authority, then the same shall be looked at as per law and it shall be considered as per the prevailing Government Order. 2026:UHC:4138 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the Principal of the concerned college. If he makes representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken as per law, within six weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 25.05.2026 Mahinder/